Technical Writer Recruiters

No upfront fee
Pay only if you hire
Technology only
We reach engineers who aren't on job boards
Replacement guarantee on standard searches

Documentation SpecialistTechnical CommunicatorContent DeveloperDocumentation SpecialistTechnical CommunicatorContent Developer

What this hire really comes down to

Hiring a technical writer is hiring someone who turns specialist knowledge into material that a customer, administrator or developer can use without contacting anyone. Buyers come to us when documentation lags the product, when support keeps answering the same questions, or when a regulated deliverable needs consistent structure. The central difficulty is that writing quality is easy to claim and hard to judge from a resume, which is why we review writing samples ourselves before presenting a candidate.

Environments differ sharply. In software documentation teams the work is API references, tutorials, release notes and help centers, often kept in Markdown inside Git alongside code. In engineering and defense documentation groups the work leans toward structured authoring, with DITA, controlled terminology and review cycles. Freelance writers bring flexibility but need clear scoping. State which world you live in, because a docs-as-code writer and a MadCap Flare author often have little overlap in daily habits.

The skill underneath the tools is subject matter expert interviewing. A good writer extracts what an engineer knows in thirty minutes, tests the instructions on the real product, and notices when the interface contradicts the draft. They push back on unclear designs and advocate for the reader. Ask whether they can install and use the product themselves, and whether they treat docs as part of release rather than an afterthought.

What we check before you see anyone

Writing samples reviewed by us
We read samples for structure, accuracy and audience awareness, then share our notes. We ask the candidate how each was produced, who reviewed it and what changed afterward.
Docs-as-code with Markdown and Git
Ask how they submit documentation changes: branches, pull requests, review comments and preview builds. Writers who have only edited in a web editor may need support in a code review environment.
DITA and MadCap Flare
For structured authoring roles, probe topic based writing, conditional content, reuse and single sourcing. Ask about output formats and how they managed translation or versioning.
SME interviewing
Ask them to describe preparing for an interview with a busy engineer, and what they do when answers conflict. Look for preparation, follow up and verification against the product.

Send Us Your Open Role Book a 15-minute call with Ivan Call 305-306-4829

Where we find them

Software documentation teams supply writers who live inside release cycles and understand developer workflows. Look for those who have published API or administrator documentation and handled feedback from real users. Their strength is pace of change; their weakness may be limited exposure to formal review processes.

Engineering and defense documentation groups provide writers fluent in controlled language, standards and structured tools. They are rigorous and usually meticulous, which suits regulated or safety related content, though some will need adjustment to agile cadence.

Freelance writers are a third pool, useful when you need breadth or short projects. Some also move to permanent roles for stability. Support specialists and trainers who write well occasionally cross over and should be tested through samples.

Mistakes we see

Treating a credential as the answer
Do not let writing samples reviewed by us become a keyword filter. We ask the candidate how each was produced, who reviewed it and what changed afterward.
Leaving the actual scope out
Put the responsibility for docs-as-code with markdown and git in the brief, including who helps the hire and who decides. Ask how they submit documentation changes: branches, pull requests, review comments and preview builds.
Waiting until the offer to discuss the work
Discuss what the person will own in dita and madcap flare before the interview loop. Ask about output formats and how they managed translation or versioning.

The search in three steps

Agree the brief
We begin by asking who reads your documentation and what goes wrong without it. That tells us whether you need a writer, an editor or a documentation lead, and what tools are fixed.
Find and speak with people
Candidates complete a conversation about their process and we review samples before introduction. Where possible we suggest a short paid writing exercise from you, scoped fairly.
Introduce the people who fit
We send a written brief on each person you meet, including why the work fits and the questions still worth asking about sme interviewing. You decide who to interview. We help with the conversations through the offer.

Red flags include samples that restate marketing language, procedures that were never tested, and inability to explain who the reader was. Good evidence includes an edited before and after, a style guide they authored or enforced, and a story about a difficult SME. Technical depth should match your audience, from end user guides to developer references.

Think about ownership as well. Documentation tends to be nobody's job until it becomes a crisis, so decide who will review the writer's drafts, who approves publication and how updates are triggered when the product changes. A writer dropped into an environment with no engineering review will either guess or stall. The strongest hires ask about this in the interview, and the answers they hear often shape whether they accept. If you want the writer to also shape information architecture or a style guide, say so now, because that is a more senior scope than editing and formatting.

Questions about this search

When will we see a shortlist?

We agree the search plan after checking your requirements for writing samples reviewed by us and docs-as-code with markdown and git, rather than promising a date before the brief is clear. We read samples for structure, accuracy and audience awareness, then share our notes.

What if a candidate gets a counteroffer?

We ask what would make someone leave work involving writing samples reviewed by us, and what could make them stay. Before you invest in interviews, we discuss whether your offer changes the problem they want to leave, including the responsibility for sme interviewing.

Should this role be remote or on site?

Experience with writing samples reviewed by us and docs-as-code with markdown and git does not settle the location question. Tell us what access and supervision the work needs, including who owns decisions about sme interviewing, so we approach people who can accept the arrangement.

How will you check fit before we interview?

We read samples for structure, accuracy and audience awareness, then share our notes. We ask the candidate how each was produced, who reviewed it and what changed afterward. Ask how they submit documentation changes: branches, pull requests, review comments and preview builds.

How does the fee work?

No upfront fee. You pay only if you hire. Agree the fee and the responsibilities covering writing samples reviewed by us and docs-as-code with markdown and git in the recruiting agreement before the search proceeds.

What if the hire does not work out?

We offer a candidate replacement guarantee on standard search agreements. The applicable period and exact terms are set out in the signed client recruiting agreement. Make sure the agreed scope includes what you expect of sme interviewing, rather than leaving that discussion until after the start.

Pay snapshot